For a manager who talks of his clear vision, Louis van Gaal
continues to be unsure of how Manchester United should play. The 20-times
champions are on a third formation in 12 matches.
Having spent all summer
working on a three-centre-back system this was ditched after the opening four
games. The results were loss-draw-loss-draw.
Next came the more traditional 4-4-2 for another four
outings. The results ran win-loss-win-win. Then, after Van Gaal decided he was
unhappy with that approach, Radamel Falcao was dropped and United drew 2-2 at
West Bromwich Albion on 20 October. Draw-loss were the following two results
before this unconvincing victory over Crystal Palace in the fourth edition of
Van Gaal’s single-striker shape.
Football is supposed to be a simple game. Pass and move.
Move forward. Repeat three or four times. Now try to score. United’s players
must surely be confused. Van Gaal admitted that to constantly change the
approach was not ideal.
“It’s too much, I think, I agree,” he said. “But I’m looking
for the balance and when you see the last four matches we have had more balance
because we haven’t conceded many goals. Nevertheless, we don’t score so much.
With the other system we scored a lot of goals.”
Van Gaal continues to sound unconvinced of what the best
method is. Yet he said: “When I answer that I have a clear vision then you have
to know that I’m [considered] arrogant but when you have seen what I have done
in my career you have to know that I have a vision and that I’m very confident
in it.
“I don’t think it is arrogant, it is self-confidence,
although not only confidence in myself but in my players, in the club, in the
structure and organisation, in the staff, in my press officer.”
As long as Liverpool, Manchester City and Arsenal continue
to stutter, there is hope in the quest for a Champions League berth. United are
only two points from West Ham United and Swansea in fourth and fifth
respectively.
“We have to ensure we maintain that we are in a position
that we can be in the first four positions,” said Van Gaal. “Of course, we need
to raise our level. It’s a matter of time but it’s also a matter of getting
over a lot of injuries. When you have nine injuries and also a suspended player
then that is always more difficult because I cannot select a lot of players. I
can only line up 11 players because I don’t have the players in the positions
that I want to play.”
The 63-year-old’s stated requirement of three years to make
United a force again is not daunting. “No, it’s a big challenge but that I knew
in advance,” he said. “Otherwise I could have chosen another club.”
The muddled messages need to be discarded soon, though. Juan
Mata’s 67th-minute strike secured three points yet it papers over two more
confused episodes.
Near the close Van Gaal swapped Daley Blind with Michael
Carrick, so the latter joined Paddy McNair as a second right-footer in central
defence. This came despite the Dutchman’s repeated mantra about always fielding
a left-right combination at centre-back, so what the thinking was remains
unclear.
There was also the curious case of his captain, Wayne
Rooney, and Marouane Fellaini not carrying out instructions. “I said at
half-time to Rooney and Fellaini that you have to play higher [up the field] in
the supporting of Van Persie,” said the manager. “That was not our gameplan –
they were doing that and I had to correct them at half-time. Then they were playing
higher [after the break].”
To allow a whole 45 minutes to pass with two players
disrupting strategy before it is corrected seems slightly staggering. These are
the kind of details that can prove costly and Palace should kick themselves.
As Neil Warnock said: “That was my best chance of beating
United at Old Trafford.” His team are above the relegation zone only on goal
difference but the manager is optimistic.
“I’m quite pleased, really, because there are eight or nine
teams in it and it is very close. We are all going to be scrapping and take our
chances and get your points when you can.”
Man of the match Luke Shaw (Manchester United)
[Guardian]
No comments:
Post a Comment